tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6727567219301297669.post1578678903930619189..comments2023-10-17T09:26:24.946-04:00Comments on the other half: Warning: Actual Legal ContentWillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06555529611298852351noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6727567219301297669.post-957326876696172382009-08-12T16:39:58.390-04:002009-08-12T16:39:58.390-04:00You're right on both counts:
1) Normally the ...You're right on both counts:<br /><br />1) Normally the charge is laid when someone is in the process of obtaining a quantity of drugs, and the police intervene and arrest, such that the drugs never actually come into the possession of the accused. The opposite set of circumstances is present here -- aside from the large quantity of controlled substance found, there are no indicia of intent to traffic. Which is why ...<br /><br />2) "Who in their right mind buys pounds of drugs not to traffic" is exactly what the federal Crown will have to ask the court.Willhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06555529611298852351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6727567219301297669.post-83129609577589669002009-08-12T14:35:07.834-04:002009-08-12T14:35:07.834-04:00I guess my first impression was someone who got bu...I guess my first impression was someone who got busted trying to buy like pounds of drugs. BUt they were caught in the act of trying to buy the drugs. Who in their right mind buys pounds of drugs not to traffic?<br /><br />Case closed!<br /><br />just call me detective Columbo.<br /><br />wait there's one more thing...Ryan Marrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11826712381648175427noreply@blogger.com